Trending...
- HR Tech Awards Program Celebrates 6th Year: Showcases Top Hiring, Talent, and HR Technologies
- NAMI Collier's annual 'Hope Shines' mental health awareness walk returns to Arthrex
- Robinson earns fourth straight supplier award from Rolls-Royce
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Floridant -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on The Floridant
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on The Floridant
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on The Floridant
- Flags at Half-Staff in Honor of Florida State University
- Florida: Governor Ron DeSantis Signs Four Bills
- American Protection Corp. Clarifies No Affiliation with American Vehicle Protection Corp
- FeelWise to Exhibit at ATD 2025 International Conference & EXPO in Washington, DC
- Beauty Elevated: McAllister Spa Delivers Glamour, Wellness & Style in the Heart of Miami Beach
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on The Floridant
- 'Share the Shelf' encourages seasonal residents to donate canned goods, boxed foods
- Webinar Announcement: Mexico's Evolving AML/CFT Environment: FATF Review and FTO Designations
- Two rare waterfront parcels totaling 4.4 acres in Palmetto hit market
- United Way Resiliency Hub opens new Cape Coral location
- FORMULA 1® CRYPTO.COM MIAMI GRAND PRIX 2025 and Hard Rock International Announce Thrilling Entertainment Lineup Featuring Pitbull, Kygo, Tiësto and Kaskade
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on The Floridant
- Iohexol Injection of Beilu Pharmaceutical Receives MA in the EU
- Thrive Cannabis Marketplace Opens New Main Street Dispensary in Las Vegas Arts District
- ReferFriends.io Officially Launches: A New Global Hub for Sharing and Discovering Referral Codes
- Emerging Managers Podcast Launches, Highlighting New Players in Venture Capital Outperforming the Status Quo
- Decision Tactical unveils new all-inclusive packages for ultimate experience
- North American Security Launches New Website to Reflect Evolving Industry Demands and Client-Centered Solutions
- Treasure Coast Seafood & Marine Wildlife Art Festival Returns June 7-8, 2025
- Home Run Pest & Termite Control Launches Monthly Mosquito Service to Help Wylie, Plano, and Rockwall Homeowners Reclaim Their Backyards
- Jayson Warner Smith joins the cast of Tulsa King, The Good Daughter and Murdaugh Murders in 2025
- Digital Watchdog and Deep Sentinel Partner to Deliver Integrated AI-Powered Security Solutions
- Oracle and Its Diverse Paths to the Cloud: The Strategic Vision of Jose Carlos Moreira
- Nutter Custom Construction Wins Best Overall Custom Home at 2025 Parade of Homes
- Local Leap Marketing Wins Creative Excellence Award for Healthcare Web Design
- Home Run Pest & Termite Control Delivers No-Contract Pest Solutions to Wylie, Rockwall & Surrounding Areas
- Lauren Coyle Rosen Unveils Debut Album 'Purify Flame'
- Old Vines Naples at Mercato recognized as finalist for two top wine lists in Florida
- Exit 10, Inc., doing business as SouthOrd, Secures GSA Multiple Award Schedule Contract with the Help of Government Marketplace LLC
- American Mensa Welcomes 7-Year-Old Savannah Boy
- Portland Hosts Mensa's 2025 Mind Games®
- Goodwill Assists Charlotte County Entrepreneurs